Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I am very happy I changed. I love the product, but more so I am thrilled with Tech Support. You are knowledgeable, polite, pleasant and professional." - Comment from Pat
"I have to tell you though that using the IQFeed API is about the easiest and cleanest I have seen for some time." - Comment from Jim
"For anyone considering using DTN.IQ for a data feed, my experience with the quality of data and the tech support has been very positive." - Comment from Public Forum
"If you are serious about your trading I would not rely on IB data for serious daytrading. Took me a while to justify the cost of IQ Feed and in the end, it's just a 2 point stop on ES. Better safe than sorry" - Comment from Public Forum
"I am a hedge fund manager here. It’s funny, I have a Bloomberg terminal and a Bridge feed, but I still like having my DTN feed!" - Comment from Feras
"I ran your IQFeed DDE vs. my broker vs. a level II window for some slow-moving options. I would see the level II quote change, then your feed update instantaneously. My broker's DDE, however, would take as much as 30 seconds to update. I am not chasing milliseconds, but half a minute is unacceptable." - Comment from Rob
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"I like you guys better than *******...much more stable and a whole lot fewer issues." - Comment from Philip
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »IQFeed 3rd Party Software Support »IQ and Sierra charts
Author Topic: IQ and Sierra charts (3 messages, Page 1 of 1)

Dave
-Interested User-
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 27, 2007


Posted: Oct 27, 2007 01:33 PM          Msg. 1 of 3
I have been using the IQ data with Sierra charts now for a few months and notice that my CPU usage is significantly higher with the IQ feed than other data feeds I have used.

Also, when comparing tick charts to volume charts I notice that each bar is exactly the amount of ticks I have it set for in the charts, while the bars in volume charts vary greatly from the amount I have set.

Any thoughts on why these are ocurring?

Thanks

DTN_Jay_Froscheiser
-VP, Product Operations-
Posts: 1746
Joined: May 3, 2004

DTN IQFeed/DTN.IQ/DTN NxCore


Posted: Oct 27, 2007 02:13 PM          Msg. 2 of 3
Hi Dave,

CPU will likely be higher with IQFeed due to the volume of data we send. Especially when compared with lower cost or free brokerage feeds, you will notice that we send every quote and trade from the exchange while others are sending aggregated, filtered or snapshot data. During peak market hours, this can equate to a decent percentage more data being sent and processed. We have just released a beta version of IQFeed that reduces the CPU utilization of the IQFeed client. I would suggest downloading and installing this to give it a shot and seeing if you notice a difference. It is available at www.iqfeed.net (click download).

I can only give a guess on the tick vs. volume bars issue since this is a function of the Sierra Charts software, not the feed. When counting ticks, each tick is equal to one. Thus, with a resolution of 1, you can easily define when the next bar should be built. When you look at volume bars, each tick can contain any number of shares/contracts. Thus, the chart needs to determine when to actually break to the next bar.

For example, a 100 tick chart knows to a resolution of 1 tick when it reaches 100. Thus, a new bar is built exactly every 100 ticks. On a 100 share/contract volume chart, the bar may have counted 90 shares/contracts, then receives a trade of 20 shares/contracts. It is up to the software to decide if it should create the new bar at 90 shares/contracts or add the next 20 and thus have 110 shares/contracts represented in that bar.

Hopefully that makes sense!

Jay Froscheiser
DTN - Trading Markets

Dave
-Interested User-
Posts: 2
Joined: Oct 27, 2007


Posted: Oct 28, 2007 07:41 AM          Msg. 3 of 3
Thanks Jay, I will try the beta version and take up the matter of volume charts with Sierra.

Thanks again
 

 

Time: Sat April 20, 2024 12:12 AM CFBB v1.2.0 13 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003