Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)

"Thanks for following up with me. You guys do a great job in tech support." - Comment from Phelps
"I just wanted to tell you what a fine job you have been doing. While *******, from what I hear, has been down and out, off and on, IQ feed has held like a champ this week." - Comment from Shirin
"Thank you so much - awesome feed, awesome service!" - Comment from Greg via Email
"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email
"I used to have *******, but they are way more money for the same thing. I have had no probs with data from DTN since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I have been using IQFeed now for a few years in MultiCharts and I have zero complaints. Very, very rare to have any data hiccups or anything at all go wrong." - Comment from Public Forum
"Everything is working great ! Very impressive client. The news refreshes better and is more pertinent than the ******* feed I paid $ 100/month for. I Also like the charts a lot." - Comment from Leon
"I use IQ Feed, Great stuff as far as data analysis information, storage and retrieval is concerned." - Comment from Public Forum
"Thanks for all of your help. Great customer service deserves to be recognized which one the reasons I've been a customer of DTN for over 10 years!" - Comment from Stuart
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Product Support »IQFeed 3rd Party Software Support »Tick, Second and Minute Data in HistoryLookup3
Author Topic: Tick, Second and Minute Data in HistoryLookup3 (2 messages, Page 1 of 1)

-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 145
Joined: Mar 31, 2008

Posted: Mar 8, 2009 02:11 PM          Msg. 1 of 2
I am comparing data retrieved by "ReqHistoryTickDatapoints" with data retrieved by "ReqHistoryIntervalDatapoints," using two different intervals for the latter: 60 seconds and 1 second. Please consult the attached Word file to illustrate the question.

The requested data begin March 6 of this year. They do not match up at the start because of the number of records requested, but they come into synch at 15:54:46. There are two Ticks for this second (green highlight), and they are matched correctly in the Minute data with the 15:55:00 record, both as to price and volume. The next two Ticks at 15:55:16 (blue highlight) also match the minute data, both as to volume and the different prices of the Ticks. These data are also found in the Second data, although one would have expected the time specification to have been at the Second level, not the Minute level.

When we come to the group of 19 Ticks for 16:46 (yellow highlight), we still get a correct grouping in the Minute data (shown in 16:47:00). But one would have expected five separate records in the Second data because the 19 different ticks occurred in 5 different seconds. Instead, we get the same grouping we got in the Minute data. In fact, it is clear that the Second and Minute data do not differ at all.

Perhaps there is some specification for a minimum limit to the interval specification, but I have not found it. I'd appreciate some help on this.

N.B. When I went to attach the Word document, I notice that you don't allow .doc files, only .txt files, so the highlighting is gone. But I think I have included enough information that you can easily mark the groupings yourself.


File Attached: IQFeed Results.txt (downloaded 1171 times)

-DTN Guru-
Posts: 2084
Joined: Nov 21, 2005

Posted: Mar 9, 2009 10:26 AM          Msg. 2 of 2
Eric, you are correct. This bit of information apparently never got added to the documentation. The protocol was designed to allow second intervals in the future but it is currently being limited to minutes. I will make sure the documentation gets updated to reduce confusion on this.
Edited by DTN_Steve_S on Mar 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM


Time: Wed August 5, 2020 5:16 PM CFBB v1.2.0 0 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003