Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"Previously I was using *******. IQFeed is WAY more economical, and for my charting needs is just as good, if not better." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"As a past ******* customer(and not a happy one), IQ Feed by DTN is a much better and cheaper product with great customer support. I have had no problems at all since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum
"I just wanted to tell you what a fine job you have been doing. While *******, from what I hear, has been down and out, off and on, IQ feed has held like a champ this week." - Comment from Shirin
"With HUGE volume on AAPL and RIMM for 2 days, everyone in a trading room was whining about freezes, crashes and lag with *******, RealTick, TS and Cyber. InvestorRT with IQFeed was rock solid. I mean SOLID!" - Comment from Public IRC Chat
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
"IQ feed is brilliant. The support is mind-bending. What service!" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"The people at Nirvana have very nice things to say about your company and I can see why! Price and service is a potent combination." - Comment from Ed
"I used to have *******, but they are way more money for the same thing. I have had no probs with data from DTN since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
"I would just like to say that IQFeed version 4 is running very well and I am very happy with its performance. I would also like to extend a big thanks for the fast and efficient help that I always receive. My questions and concerns are always addressed promptly. Way to go!" - Comment from Josh in CO.
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »IQFeed Developer »IQFeed Developer Support »Bug in Level2 BidTime/AskTime?
Author Topic: Bug in Level2 BidTime/AskTime? (4 messages, Page 1 of 1)

altmany
-Interested User-
Posts: 50
Joined: Jul 30, 2018

IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector


Posted: May 2, 2019 04:15 AM          Msg. 1 of 4
when I ran a level 2 request for MSFT outside regular trading hours, I got the following data row among others:

<= 20190502 04:18:38.700 (Level2) Z,MSFT,BATS,0.,129.39,0,600,18:29:49.000347,2019-05-01,52,99:99:99.000000,F,T,T

According to the documentation (http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/Level2UpdateSummaryMessage.cfm), this row translates as follows:

      Symbol: MSFT
MMID: BATS
Bid: 0
Ask: 129.39
BidSize: 0
AskSize: 600
BidTime: 18:29:49.000347
Date: 2019-05-01
Condition: 52 (regular)
AskTime: 99:99:99.000000
BidInfoValid: False
AskInfoValid: True
EndOfMessage: True

The reported BidTime and AskTime make no sense - it is the Bid which is invalid (and should have the invalid time of 99:99:99), and the Ask which is valid (and should have the valid time of 18:29:49). Is this a bug in IQFeed's code?

If I'm correct, perhaps it would be simpler to fix the documentation than to fix the code - switching between BidTime/AskTime in the documentation will seem a bit awkward (because Bid is often reported before Ask), but at least it would be consistent with your current code and would not require you to do any code fixes.

Please advise.

Yair Altman
IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector
https://UndocumentedMatlab.com/IQML

I am not a DTN employee; my post reflects my personal opinion

altmany
-Interested User-
Posts: 50
Joined: Jul 30, 2018

IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector


Posted: May 14, 2019 10:28 AM          Msg. 2 of 4
Hi guys - kindly comment on this...

Yair Altman
IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector
https://UndocumentedMatlab.com/IQML

I am not a DTN employee; my post reflects my personal opinion

DTN_Steve_S
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 2084
Joined: Nov 21, 2005


Posted: May 15, 2019 05:41 AM          Msg. 3 of 4
My apologies for the delayed response here.
You've decoded the message correctly.
It would appear that this is a bug in the feed but I don't know how or why it occurred at this time. If you have more examples, it will help in tracking this down, but I don't believe this is a case of simply applying the valid time to the wrong field.

altmany
-Interested User-
Posts: 50
Joined: Jul 30, 2018

IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector


Posted: May 15, 2019 06:08 AM          Msg. 4 of 4
Thanks Steve - here is another example that I have just seen, this time for the FB symbol:

<= 20190515 07:01:01.237 (Level2) Z,FB,CHXE,0.,180.71,0,100,07:00:17.012566,2019-05-15,52,99:99:99.000000,F,T,T

In this new example, the Bid is invalid and the Ask is valid, yet the timestamps appear switched.

As far as I could tell, this problem is evident whenever one Bid/Ask is valid and the other is not. But it is quite possible that the problem of switched BidTime<->AskTime is consistent even when both Bid and Ask are valid, and nobody has reported it so far because it would be nearly impossible to detect except in the specific case of just one of them being invalid.


Yair Altman
IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector
https://UndocumentedMatlab.com/IQML

I am not a DTN employee; my post reflects my personal opinion

Edited by altmany on May 15, 2019 at 06:08 AM
 

 

Time: Sun August 9, 2020 9:01 PM CFBB v1.2.0 15 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003