Quote: I noticed that using the API you can get a time stamp in a message that's sent with each transaction. I was hoping that you might consider adding this field in the IQLINK client. I guess I could do the house keeping to determine the minute periods if it was there but I am sure I 'm not the only one interested in this field. I think that since this is already computed by your servers it would be much more efficient and less effort for DTN to do this then the user. Is there a process that the users can effect that helps steer your effort in this matter, perhaps a poll? I know that this is not a democracy but it would seem to me that there should be no difference in the ability of the IQLINK client and the users of the API to access the market data. If this is true, and the IQLINK users are only allowed access to a subset of the information that the API user get, than it seems to me that the users of the IQLINK client are consdered a second class citizen in the DTN universe. I don't want to sound like I know all of the intracasies of what it takes to do this but I think there should be some parity here. I am aware of the bandwith limitations between the DDE and the COM/TCPIP intefaces that you use. Who decides what information is available in the IQLINK client? I'm very interested in finding out what percentage of your users use the IQLINK client versus all others. Once this is known, I would begin to understand the marketing decisions at DTN to decide who gets what. I noticed that you mentioned that DTN intends to make an EXCEL add-in, but it's on the back burner. Can you tell me how much interest there is in this software? If there was enough interest I might consider writing one myself.