Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"DTN has never given me problems. It is incredibly stable. In fact I've occasionally lost the data feed from Interactive Brokers, but still been able to trade because I'm getting good data from DTN." - Comment from Leighton
"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email
"IQ feed is brilliant. The support is mind-bending. What service!" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"If someone needs the best quality data and backfill beyond what their broker provides at a rate that is the best in the industry, I highly recommend IQFeed." - Comment from Josh via Public Forum
"I ran your IQFeed DDE vs. my broker vs. a level II window for some slow-moving options. I would see the level II quote change, then your feed update instantaneously. My broker's DDE, however, would take as much as 30 seconds to update. I am not chasing milliseconds, but half a minute is unacceptable." - Comment from Rob
"Thanks for the great product and support. During this week of high volume trading, my QuoteTracker + IQ Feed setup never missed a beat. Also, thanks for your swiftness in responding to data issues. I was on ******* for a few years before I made the switch over early this year, and wish I had done it a long time ago." - Comment from Ken
"Version 4.0.0.2 has been working well for me and I appreciate that it is now a much tighter client to work with. I feel I can go to press with my own application and rely on a stable platform" - Comment from David in IA.
"My broker in Davenport suggested I give you a try as he uses your service and says its the best." - Comment from Bill via RT Chat
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: wpleasant
About Contact
Joined: Apr 16, 2012 02:51 PM
Last Post: Jan 26, 2016 12:21 PM
Last Visit: Jan 26, 2016 07:32 PM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
wpleasant has contributed to 3 posts out of 21185 total posts (0.01%) in 4,392 days (0.00 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Wish List » Trade Corrections & Cancellations Jan 26, 2016 12:21 PM (Total replies: 1)

I've discussed this with developer support recently but I thought a formal request in the forum may help things along.

Please send us trade Corrections & Cancellations. Without them any data grouped by tick or volume following an extra/incorrect trade is garbage or even dangerous. Even the derivative data calculated by iqconnect.exe would be incorrect without a fresh call.

My understanding is that the current workaround is monitoring the "Total Volume" for reductions and then calling HTT comparing some time span of trades to the historical lookup for the error...

Thanks,

William


Thanks for the reply,

I'm just now revisiting this and have noticed that millisecond time stamps start on 2012-12-24 for IBM and AAPL. Before the 24th the data appears to revert back to version <= 4.9. Is this consistent for all US equities and will the millisecond time stamps be back-filled to the full 120 days?


While working with protocol 5.0 I’ve noticed that the earliest available equity data (“IBM”,”SPY”,”AAPL”) I’ve been able to download using “HTT” starts on 2013-01-14. Is this something on my end or has the historical data not been backfilled?

Also, with level 1 update/ summary messages is it safe to assume that the “Current Update Field Names” will remain in the same order for the foreseeable future and that if any additional fields are added they would be appended on the end of the message?

Example messages from iqfeed after setting protocol to 5.0:

S,CURRENT PROTOCOL,5.0,
S,CURRENT UPDATE FIELDNAMES,Symbol,Most Recent Trade,Most Recent Trade Size,Most Recent Trade TimeMS,Most Recent Trade Market Center,Total Volume,Bid,Bid Size,Ask,Ask Size,Open,High,Low,Close,Message Contents,Most Recent Trade Conditions

Best regards,

William


Time: Wed April 24, 2024 5:33 AM CFBB v1.2.0 6 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003