DTN IQFeed, DTN.IQ, DTN ProphetX Support Forums

Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)

"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post

"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email

"You have an excellent product !!!!!!" - Comment from Arely

"I just wanted to let u know that your data feed/service is by far the best!!! Your unfiltered tick data is excellent for reading order flow and none of your competitors delivers this quality of data!" - Comment from Peter via Email

"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark

"I am a hedge fund manager here. It’s funny, I have a Bloomberg terminal and a Bridge feed, but I still like having my DTN feed!" - Comment from Feras

"Thank you so much - awesome feed, awesome service!" - Comment from Greg via Email

"After all the anxiety I had with my previous data provider it is a relief not to have to worry about data speed and integrity." - Comment from Eamonn

"And by the way, have to say this. I love the IQFeed software. It's rock solid and it has a really nice API." - Comment from Thomas via RT Chat

"Everything is working great ! Very impressive client. The news refreshes better and is more pertinent than the ******* feed I paid $ 100/month for. I Also like the charts a lot." - Comment from Leon

Home

Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather

DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter

»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »IQFeed Developer Support »Incorrect L2 data for futures

Author	Topic: Incorrect L2 data for futures (4 messages, Page 1 of 1)
aQuant -Interested User- Posts: 49 Joined: Jul 20, 2012	Posted: Jan 26, 2019 10:36 PM Msg. 1 of 4 I often see incorrect/nonsensical L2 data right after a large trade takes out a few levels on the DOM (depth of market). For example, this is from CLH9 1/22/2019 at 06:01.44.16260am EST the ask price is off by almost hundred ticks for a few updates in a row. Then at 06:01:44.162895 it 'comes back' to normal. I have other examples, where crossed bid/ask MD0x levels are reported for a number of updates (typically following a trade that sweeps a few levels). Is this something that can be fixed? QCLH19,MD01,53.13,53.15,10,18,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.021207,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD02,53.12,53.16,34,25,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.970119,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,53.11,53.17,54,22,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.970383,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD04,53.1,53.18,76,28,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.883353,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD05,53.09,53.19,32,28,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.874302,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD06,53.08,53.2,37,22,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.011207,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD07,53.07,53.21,80,23,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.037856,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD08,53.06,53.22,38,29,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.037856,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD09,53.05,53.23,90,18,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.874302,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD10,53.04,53.24,39,24,06:01:44.162613,2019-01-22,52,06:01:43.874302,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD01,54.18,54.18,0,3886,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,F,T,F, QCLH19,MD02,53.13,54.19,10,9,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,53.12,54.2,10,23,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD04,53.11,54.21,41,26,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD05,53.1,54.22,76,15,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD06,53.09,54.23,32,14,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD07,53.08,54.24,37,8,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD08,53.07,54.25,80,22,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD09,53.06,54.26,38,8,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD10,53.05,54.27,90,14,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD01,53.11,53.12,49,19,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD02,53.1,53.13,95,1,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,53.09,53.15,32,18,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD04,53.08,53.16,37,25,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD05,53.07,53.17,80,22,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD06,53.06,53.18,38,28,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD07,53.05,53.19,90,28,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD08,53.04,53.2,39,22,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD09,53.03,53.21,55,23,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD10,53.02,53.22,48,29,06:01:44.162895,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162895,T,T,T,
DTN_Steve_S -DTN Guru- Posts: 2093 Joined: Nov 21, 2005	Posted: Jan 28, 2019 07:02 AM Msg. 2 of 4 Hello, I do see a potential issue here: QCLH19,MD01,54.18,54.18,0,3886,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,F,T,F, For whatever reason, the Bid is invalid in this message. This is marked in the BidInfoValid flag at the end of the message. I can't think of a reason that the MD01 would ever be invalid though (this is what requires investigation). Also, make sure you are paying attention to the end of group flag in the last field of the message. This field , when false, indicates that the message needs to be processed as part of a group. Essentially, only when this field is true should all depth levels be considered correct. Edited by DTN_Steve_S on Jan 28, 2019 at 07:03 AM
aQuant -Interested User- Posts: 49 Joined: Jul 20, 2012	Posted: Jan 28, 2019 09:31 AM Msg. 3 of 4 Yes, I am aware of the Bid/AskInfoValid flag. Note this line though: QCLH19,MD10,53.05,54.27,90,14,06:01:44.162620,2019-01-22,52,06:01:44.162620,T,T,T, which indicates end of group updates. It still has the 54.27 ask (this time all are flagged valid). This ask is definitely not valid, about 100 ticks off of correct price.
aQuant -Interested User- Posts: 49 Joined: Jul 20, 2012	Posted: Jan 29, 2019 12:27 PM Msg. 4 of 4 Here is an example of a few situations from yesterday where best bid is reported above best ask (MD01 updates below). This is from 1/28/2019 CLH19 instrument. QCLH19,MD01,52.99,52.89,4,5,01:41:26.756957,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD02,52.98,52.9,10,1,01:41:26.756957,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,52.87,52.91,57,13,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD04,52.86,52.95,67,8,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD05,52.85,52.96,70,3,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD06,52.84,52.97,53,9,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD07,52.83,52.98,90,3,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD08,52.82,52.99,81,3,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD09,52.81,53.,48,35,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD10,52.8,53.01,109,23,01:41:26.757060,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757060,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD01,52.99,52.89,4,6,01:41:26.756957,2019-01-28,52,01:41:26.757075,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD01,52.85,52.84,31,2,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD02,52.82,52.85,27,56,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,52.81,52.86,55,33,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD04,52.8,52.87,50,42,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD05,52.79,52.88,36,26,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD06,52.78,52.89,40,31,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD07,52.77,52.9,38,70,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD08,52.76,52.91,34,31,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD09,52.75,52.92,47,42,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD10,52.74,52.93,37,47,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613372,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD02,52.82,52.85,27,6,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613386,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,52.81,52.86,55,22,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613386,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD03,52.81,52.86,55,4,07:03:29.613372,2019-01-28,52,07:03:29.613403,T,T,T, QCLH19,MD01,52.42,52.41,3,2,09:07:55.677653,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD02,52.41,52.43,10,15,09:07:55.677676,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD03,52.39,52.44,37,45,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD04,52.38,52.45,61,41,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD05,52.37,52.46,41,49,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD06,52.36,52.47,60,46,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD07,52.35,52.48,98,42,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD08,52.34,52.49,40,33,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD09,52.33,52.5,47,37,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,F, QCLH19,MD10,52.32,52.51,62,24,09:07:55.677684,2019-01-28,52,09:07:55.677684,T,T,T,