|
Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!
(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)
"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"I started a trial a few weeks back before the market went wild. DTN.IQ didn’t miss anything and beat my other provider. I decided to stay with you because of the great service through all the volatility." - Comment from Mike
"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
"IQ feed is brilliant. The support is mind-bending. What service!" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I am enjoying the feed very much - so superior to the broker provided feed I was previously using." - Comment from George
"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark
"My broker in Davenport suggested I give you a try as he uses your service and says its the best." - Comment from Bill via RT Chat
"Version 4.0.0.2 has been working well for me and I appreciate that it is now a much tighter client to work with. I feel I can go to press with my own application and rely on a stable platform" - Comment from David in IA.
"And by the way, have to say this. I love the IQFeed software. It's rock solid and it has a really nice API." - Comment from Thomas via RT Chat
|
|
|
|
Joined: |
May 24, 2011 06:14 PM |
Last Post: |
Sep 30, 2012 07:17 PM |
Last Visit: |
Oct 4, 2012 04:18 PM |
Website: |
|
Location: |
|
Occupation: |
|
Interests: |
|
|
AIM: |
|
ICQ: |
|
MSN IM: |
|
Yahoo IM: |
|
|
traps has contributed to 15 posts out of 21185 total posts
(0.07%) in 4,715 days (0.00 posts per day).
20 Most recent posts:
Thanks again Todd. I still have a number of questions about this. Is it possible to talk to someone on the phone?
Hi Todd,
I've also been looking at the volumes for the wheat contract as another example (sorry for switching the thread so much). Prior to a time in early 2008 the pit and Globex volumes were separate numbers and the combined (+) volume was equal to the sum of the two - i.e. what I'd expect. But from early 2008 the pit and Globex volumes are set exactly equal to each other (with the combined volume still the sum of the two). Then in mid 2008 all three volumes collapse to exactly the same number (with the odd anomaly, such as the 13th March 2009). I'm sure it's all very simple but I'm afraid I'm still struggling to understand this.
Cheers
> Yes, the @ sign gives you the Globex symbols for the CBOT. I do not understand > the second question - the + sign combines both, pit and Globex data, not either/or.
I'm looking at closing prices (going back to 1996). I want to make sure I understand what the closing price means for the case of the + symbol. Is it just the last tick from whichever - pit or Globex happened to have the last trade that day? Or, for instance, an average of the last trade of each? I think you're saying that it's the first but I wanted to make absolutely sure.
> I show that the daily data for @KC# in IQFeed goes back to March 20, 1996. > Earlier this year, we merged the data so prior to roughly February of 2008, > the quotes are from the pit symbols. The daily data after February of 2008 > comes from the Globex contract.
So does that mean that @KC# has data merged from pit and Globex? I'm now confused again because I though that @ meant Globex only! For @KC# I can see a gap between 18th September 2002 and 18th December 2002. Are you seeing data for that period? If so I must be looking at it incorrectly.
Thanks
Hi Todd. Any idea about this one? I'm keen to figure out what's going on. Thanks.
Thanks Todd. That makes sense.
So just to be clear, does @ always refer to Globex for the CBOT contracts? How was it decided which number to use for + in the transition period?
The ICE US coffee contract (KC) only has @ data but going all the way back to 1996. Does that mean that it's been traded (only) electronically since then?
On a slightly separate subject, some of the historical data has large gaps in the time series. For example, ICE US coffee has a period of several months where the data is missing. What's the reason for this?
Could you tell me exactly (i.e. as much information as you can give) what the difference is between SM, @SM and +SM? Are they all for the same contract on the same exchange? I'd like to understand precisely how where the numbers come from to ensure that I'm using them correctly.
Also, there is data for, say, @SM# from 1996 until today but I can only see bars for 85% of the weekdays in that period. What is the reason for the gaps? For some contracts there can be gaps in the data of several months.
Thanks for your help.
So how are we supposed to know which data we need to adjust, and which has already been adjusted?
Hi,
Could we please get a version of iqconnect.exe which doesn't bring up a window when connecting? Ideally it would be another executable called something like iqconnect_console.exe.
Why? To make it easy to run on Linux. Currently, iqconnect.exe brings up a window when connecting and thus you have to installed a ton of extract packages to run Xvfb. If we had a console version, all this extra weight and complexity wouldn't be needed.
Thanks a lot,
Adam
I'm using the 4.8 beta with .net, and it appears that, for a single query, the callback for both ReqSymbolByNAICS and ReqSymbolBySIC for DTNIQFeedCOMLib.SystemInfoClass is called many times (one line of the result per call) instead of just once (multiple lines in a single call). Is this intentional? How are we meant to know when all the results are in?
I see, I misunderstood the behaviour (thinking ENDMSG occurred with every callback).
thanks again
Hi
When using the historical lookup COM method ReqHistoryTickTimeframe, I am wondering how one is supposed to use the dataPointsPerSend parameter.
If it is set to some non-zero value, say 100, then the time-series of ticks will be split up into separate messages, each with no more thant 100 ticks in it.
My question is, how do I know when all the messages/ticks have been received? My call-back will get called for each message, but is there a way to tell when all messages pertaining to this request have been received? Since I do not know the number of ticks beforehand, I do not know how many messages to expect.
thanks
Hi, I'm trying out the 'Sample DDE Spreadsheet' with the Futures exchanges.
I can succeessfully download streaming data using symbols from all exchanges EXCEPT :- COMEX (globex or floor), NYMEX (globex or floor), LME, DME.
All of the other (20-25) exchanges are working fine.
I am obtaining the symbols from the symbol download tool on the website.
For the afore-mentioned exchanges I get 'Invalid Symbol" errors for every single symbol (looking at futures only).
What am I missing?
thanks
Makes sense, thanks very much.
Hi Jay, I was wondering if you could say any more about how the combined session data is produced?
Is this done at the exchange source or internally by your feed infrastructure?
Is the time-ordering correctly preserved when the streams are merged?
thanks
Hi, I was wondering how you calculate the symbol limit for getting historical data for futures.
Each futures instrument will have many individual monthly contracts in the history - does each contract count as one symbol, or is it one symbol for all of the contracts? E.g. for Crude Oil, is it one symbol 'CL' or is it one symbol for each 'CLF1', 'CLG1', 'CLH1'?
What about the continuous contract symbols 'CL#' ?
thanks!
|
|