Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"I just wanted to let u know that your data feed/service is by far the best!!! Your unfiltered tick data is excellent for reading order flow and none of your competitors delivers this quality of data!" - Comment from Peter via Email
"I am very pleased with the DTNIQ system for quotes and news." - Comment from Larry
"I just wanted to tell you what a fine job you have been doing. While *******, from what I hear, has been down and out, off and on, IQ feed has held like a champ this week." - Comment from Shirin
"The people at Nirvana have very nice things to say about your company and I can see why! Price and service is a potent combination." - Comment from Ed
"Can I get another account from you? I am tired of ******* going down so often" - Comment from George
"I am enjoying the feed very much - so superior to the broker provided feed I was previously using." - Comment from George
"If someone needs the best quality data and backfill beyond what their broker provides at a rate that is the best in the industry, I highly recommend IQFeed." - Comment from Josh via Public Forum
"Thanks for the great product and support. During this week of high volume trading, my QuoteTracker + IQ Feed setup never missed a beat. Also, thanks for your swiftness in responding to data issues. I was on ******* for a few years before I made the switch over early this year, and wish I had done it a long time ago." - Comment from Ken
"You are much better than lawyers or the phone company because you answer the phone when I call! I just love your customer service." - Comment from Isreal
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts
Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
Viewing User Profile for: trader_8317
About Contact
Joined: Sep 29, 2019 03:11 PM
Last Post: Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM
Last Visit: Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM
Website:  
Location:
Occupation:
Interests:
AIM:
ICQ:
MSN IM:
Yahoo IM:
Post Statistics
trader_8317 has contributed to 3 posts out of 21196 total posts (0.01%) in 1,695 days (0.00 posts per day).

20 Most recent posts:
IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Oct 3, 2019 03:46 AM (Total replies: 5)

Hi Gary,

I've just re-run it, and I can confirm that it's now working correctly (with 0 in the TradeAggressor field). Weird that it gave that result before.

Cheers!

IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Oct 2, 2019 03:35 AM (Total replies: 5)

Hi Gary,

Thanks for getting back to me. Please comment on this thread when the issue is resolved.

Also, thanks for the extra detail around data availability - that's useful to know.

IQFeed Developer Support » HTT Trade Aggressor Sep 29, 2019 03:18 PM (Total replies: 5)

Hi,

I'm trying to execute a HTT request, as per the example on: http://www.iqfeed.net/dev/api/docs/HistoricalviaTCPIP.cfm. I find that when I execute: "HTT,GOOGL,20190409 000000,20190409 235959,10,155959,160004,1,TESTREQUEST"
I get:
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391602,1203.6000,100,948999,1203.2900,1203.3900,10031,E,5,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391610,1203.7100,200,949199,1203.2900,1203.3900,10032,E,5,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.391615,1203.7700,50,949249,1203.2900,1203.3900,10033,O,5,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.479088,1202.6900,118,949367,1203.2900,1203.3900,5885,E,19,17,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:00.701530,1203.2900,1,949368,1203.2900,1203.3900,10034,O,5,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.215912,1202.6900,41,949409,1203.2900,1203.3900,5886,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.215982,1202.6900,6,949415,1203.2900,1203.3900,5887,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.227863,1202.6900,14,949429,1203.2900,1203.3900,5888,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:01.259771,1202.6900,39,949468,1203.2900,1203.3900,5889,O,19,8717,48,9,
TESTREQUEST,2019-04-09 16:00:02.630410,1203.2900,100,949568,1203.2900,1203.7100,10035,E,5,17,48,9,

This almost lines up with the example response given at the bottom of the link I gave, apart from the penultimate column (which I understand should be trade aggressor, with values 0-3) is 48. I've (at least tried to) set the protocol to 6.1. Could anyone shine any light on why my trade aggressor field appears to have an invalid value?

Thanks for your help in advance.


Time: Sun May 19, 2024 5:01 AM CFBB v1.2.0 4 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003