Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I started a trial a few weeks back before the market went wild. DTN.IQ didn’t miss anything and beat my other provider. I decided to stay with you because of the great service through all the volatility." - Comment from Mike
"I've never had DTN go out on me since switching. ******* would go down a couple times every month when I was using them." - Comment from Bryce in AL.
"I just wanted to let u know that your data feed/service is by far the best!!! Your unfiltered tick data is excellent for reading order flow and none of your competitors delivers this quality of data!" - Comment from Peter via Email
"It’s so nice to be working with real professionals!" - Comment from Len
"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"Version 4.0.0.2 has been working well for me and I appreciate that it is now a much tighter client to work with. I feel I can go to press with my own application and rely on a stable platform" - Comment from David in IA.
"There is no doubt that IQFeed is the best data provider. I am very satisfied with your services. And IQFeed is the only one that I would recommend to my friends. Now, most of them are using your product in China." - Comment from Zhezhe
"You have an excellent feed. Very few spikes for Spot Forex." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I am very pleased with the DTNIQ system for quotes and news." - Comment from Larry
"Excellent datafeed !!!" - Comment from Arely
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Product Support »Data and Content Support »Again: possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE#
Author Topic: Again: possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE# (5 messages, Page 1 of 1)

mvvcorp
-Interested User-
Posts: 24
Joined: Apr 7, 2010


Posted: Apr 5, 2011 05:49 PM          Msg. 1 of 5
Possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE#.

I've downloaded tick history (4 months) for LL# (continuous ) and LLU11 (single).
LL# ~ 2 Mb (ASCII file)
LLU11~ 20 Mb (ASCII file)
difference - 10 times!
It means that continuous contract have less liquidity than single contract (at 10 times!).
Obviously something wrong with continuous contract LL# (as it was for QGC#)
The same is for IE#

mvvcorp
-Interested User-
Posts: 24
Joined: Apr 7, 2010


Posted: Apr 5, 2011 06:10 PM          Msg. 2 of 5
LG# "lost" ALL(!) liquidity between 28-feb-2011, 28-mar-2011 !
And another 4-5 months in 2010.
It looks like LG# have the same problem - wrong rolling dates.

PS Why is it so hard to keep accurate rolling dates for continuous contracts?

Stan S
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 256
Joined: Apr 13, 2006


Posted: Apr 6, 2011 08:07 AM          Msg. 3 of 5
Hi Mvvcorp,

Our Market Integrity dept is checking the data & contracts. I will let you know what they find out.

Stan S

What we do today, determines how people remember us forever.
Be the positive force in someone life.

Stan S
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 256
Joined: Apr 13, 2006


Posted: Apr 7, 2011 07:47 AM          Msg. 4 of 5
Good Morning Mvvcorp.

This should be fixed over the weekend. We’re going to eliminate all other contract months from charting except H/M/U/Z. This will help the chart look a lot smoother.

Stan S

What we do today, determines how people remember us forever.
Be the positive force in someone life.

mvvcorp
-Interested User-
Posts: 24
Joined: Apr 7, 2010


Posted: Apr 7, 2011 07:35 PM          Msg. 5 of 5
Thank you
Please, let us know when the process will be over.
 

 

Time: Thu July 2, 2020 11:28 AM CFBB v1.2.0 31 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003