Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I started a trial a few weeks back before the market went wild. DTN.IQ didn’t miss anything and beat my other provider. I decided to stay with you because of the great service through all the volatility." - Comment from Mike
"The service is great, I see a noticeable improvement in my volume profiles over [broker]'s data feed" - Comment from Larry
"Awesome response, as usual. It is a sincere and refreshing pleasure to do business with DTN, compared to your competition." - Comment from Ryan
"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"I like you guys better than *******...much more stable and a whole lot fewer issues." - Comment from Philip
"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"I used to have *******, but they are way more money for the same thing. I have had no probs with data from DTN since switching over." - Comment from Public Forum Post
"Very impressed with the quality of your feed - ******* is a real donkey in comparison." - Comment from A.C. via Email
"Everything is working great with the API. I love it." - Comment from Calvin
"IQ feed is brilliant. The support is mind-bending. What service!" - Comment from Public Forum Post
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »DTN.IQ Client Software Support »IqFeed client crushes
Author Topic: IqFeed client crushes (9 messages, Page 1 of 1)

Ariloum
-Interested User-
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 22, 2014


Posted: Oct 24, 2015 07:26 AM          Msg. 1 of 9
Hello,
I've written a screener which download and update last day candles by downloading historical data, I'm using a few threads connecting to iqfeed client historical data port and if I set it's amount to 100 threads(connections) iqfeed client crushes. It works well with 40 connections thread, but I need more threads to get higher rate for updating speed. I'm using iqfeed client v.5.1.3.1.

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 24, 2015 08:06 AM          Msg. 2 of 9
Good morning,

In regards to history, 18 concurrent history requests is the maximum that can be processed at any one time, so you will not be able to pull data across 100 threads without seeing lots of errors I would guess.

That said, there is a patched build that deals with a bug that is probably what you are seeing, I'll email you a link.

Tim

Ariloum
-Interested User-
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 22, 2014


Posted: Oct 26, 2015 10:32 AM          Msg. 3 of 9
Hi Tim, thanx for your input,

I tried this patched version and looks like it works fine, need to test it for a few days.

http://prntscr.com/8vjlx0
Edited by Ariloum on Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32 AM



File Attached: QIP Shot - Screen 2015.10.26 18-28-53.png (downloaded 1629 times)

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 26, 2015 10:35 AM          Msg. 4 of 9
Glad to hear it. Thanks for letting us know.

Tim

Ariloum
-Interested User-
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 22, 2014


Posted: Oct 30, 2015 08:46 AM          Msg. 5 of 9
Sometimes I've too many errors with simultaneous history requests while I'm using 30 connections to historical service port:
E,Too many simultaneous history requests.,

Sometimes it's ok and errors are rare, but sometimes I'm getting it very often. Do you have some load balancer on your serverside which dynamically limit connections to historical service?

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 30, 2015 08:49 AM          Msg. 6 of 9
Yes, as mentioned above, there is a limit of 15 concurrent connections on pulling data from history. More than that will result in the error you are seeing. In this case, you will simply have to re-request when you have slots available, or limit your active requests to 15.

Tim
Edited by DTN_Tim Walter on Oct 30, 2015 at 09:09 AM

Ariloum
-Interested User-
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 22, 2014


Posted: Oct 30, 2015 09:20 AM          Msg. 7 of 9
Did this limit is hardcoded or it's dynamic?
Sometimes I'm going pretty well with 30 connections with only a few errors, but sometimes I receive a horde of errors..

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Oct 30, 2015 09:29 AM          Msg. 8 of 9
It is hardcoded, but it is related to how many are actually processing at any one time. Many requests happen in just milliseconds so it can appear that you are processing more than 15 requests with these smaller requests. But, if you did 15 requests for a large amount of tick data and those requests all took 10 seconds each to complete each, then all other requests would fail and return errors.

Tim

Ariloum
-Interested User-
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 22, 2014


Posted: Oct 30, 2015 09:36 AM          Msg. 9 of 9
I see, thanx for the info.
I'm receiving only last few 1minute candles to update my current stock snapshot.
 

 

Time: Fri April 26, 2024 6:36 PM CFBB v1.2.0 9 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003