DTN IQFeed, DTN.IQ, DTN ProphetX Support Forums

Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)

"I started a trial a few weeks back before the market went wild. DTN.IQ didn’t miss anything and beat my other provider. I decided to stay with you because of the great service through all the volatility." - Comment from Mike

"Its working FABULOUSLY for me!! Holy cow...there has been so much I've been missing lately, and with this feed and Linnsoft software...I'm in the game now." - Comment from Chris R.

"I've been using Neoticker RT with IQFeed for two months, and I'm very happy with both of the products (I've had IQFeed for two years with very few complaints). The service from both companies is exceptional." - Comment from Public Forum

"I like you guys better than *******...much more stable and a whole lot fewer issues." - Comment from Philip

"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark

"Thanks for the great product and support. During this week of high volume trading, my QuoteTracker + IQ Feed setup never missed a beat. Also, thanks for your swiftness in responding to data issues. I was on ******* for a few years before I made the switch over early this year, and wish I had done it a long time ago." - Comment from Ken

"If you want customer service that answers the phone, your best bet is IQFeed. I cannot stop praising them or their technical support. They are always there for you, and they are quick. I have used ****** too but the best value is IQFeed." - Comment from Public Forum

"My broker in Davenport suggested I give you a try as he uses your service and says its the best." - Comment from Bill via RT Chat

"Everything is working amazing now. I'm already impressed with the true-tick feed of IQFeed and it's ability to support my 480 symbol layout." - Comment from Tyler via Email

"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim

Home

Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather

DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter

»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »IQFeed Developer Support »Bad historical data on 2016-09-26

Author	Topic: Bad historical data on 2016-09-26 (3 messages, Page 1 of 1)
eporter -Interested User- Posts: 14 Joined: Jan 20, 2015	Posted: Sep 30, 2016 03:47 AM Msg. 1 of 3 I'm seeing problems with historical data for the day of 2016-09-26. Specifically, the volume and number of trades are both several times as large as they should be (though the price is little changed). The comparison data that I am using is what I collected on the day of 2016-09-26 through our subscription. It appears that a large number of extra ticks have simply been added to many stocks. Because the prices are reasonable, I'm wondering whether they are from a different source (such as dark pools). This isn't a huge problem for us right now. I'm simply ignoring historical data from 2016-09-26. However, it is obviously disconcerting, and my primary concern is avoiding future instances of this problem. Anyway, here's an example of the sort of difference that I'm seeing for CSBR on 2016-09-26. For what it's worth, Yahoo agrees with the volume of the existing ticks we originally received through our subscription on 2016-09-26. See https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=CSBR We've seen hundreds of other, similar examples. ----------------------------------------------- Existing total: 2740 @ 1.6723 from 5 trades Received total: 19459 @ 1.6861 from 33 trades. Existing Trade ticks: 1: 40 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:25:57.699 2: 500 @ 1.6840 at 2016-09-26 13:24:15.901 3: 2000 @ 1.6678 at 2016-09-26 15:34:40.633 4: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 15:51:23.654 5: 100 @ 1.6800 at 2016-09-26 15:58:31.004 Received Trade ticks: 1: 1500 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:24:16.996 2: 360 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:24:42.978 3: 4200 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:25:57.697 4: 40 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:25:57.699 5: 100 @ 1.6800 at 2016-09-26 10:31:28.776 6: 500 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:31:59.256 7: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:37:40.586 8: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:49:56.054 9: 300 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 10:53:41.505 10: 100 @ 1.7000 at 2016-09-26 11:07:56.745 11: 150 @ 1.6993 at 2016-09-26 11:14:53.401 12: 105 @ 1.6993 at 2016-09-26 11:15:44.908 13: 2000 @ 1.6990 at 2016-09-26 11:34:55.999 14: 100 @ 1.7000 at 2016-09-26 11:34:57.709 15: 1000 @ 1.6990 at 2016-09-26 11:37:29.280 16: 400 @ 1.6990 at 2016-09-26 11:37:29.283 17: 600 @ 1.6990 at 2016-09-26 11:37:29.298 18: 100 @ 1.7000 at 2016-09-26 11:50:43.276 19: 1400 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 12:15:50.407 20: 600 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 12:15:51.046 21: 100 @ 1.6800 at 2016-09-26 12:15:57.510 22: 300 @ 1.6691 at 2016-09-26 12:21:16.732 23: 104 @ 1.6800 at 2016-09-26 12:44:07.688 24: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 12:49:00.555 25: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 13:08:46.527 26: 500 @ 1.6840 at 2016-09-26 13:24:15.901 27: 2000 @ 1.6600 at 2016-09-26 15:31:00.252 28: 2000 @ 1.6678 at 2016-09-26 15:34:40.633 29: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 15:36:08.053 30: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 15:41:23.592 31: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 15:48:23.529 32: 100 @ 1.6900 at 2016-09-26 15:51:23.654 33: 100 @ 1.6800 at 2016-09-26 15:58:31.004
DTN_Tim Walter -DTN Guru- Posts: 1238 Joined: Apr 25, 2006	Posted: Oct 3, 2016 08:46 AM Msg. 2 of 3 Hello, I was just going over this, sorry for the delay in reply, the tick data for the 26th on CSBR appears to total up to 19459, which is what I show on the daily volume as well, and that appears to match what Yahoo is showing as well. Is this something that has already fixed itself? Tim
eporter -Interested User- Posts: 14 Joined: Jan 20, 2015	Posted: Oct 3, 2016 10:21 AM Msg. 3 of 3 Possibly. For us, it appeared on the 27th, then went away on the 28th, and then came back.