Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I'm satisfied with IQFeed. It's the most reliable and fastest quote feed I have ever used. Although I'm a resident in China, it's still very fast!" - Comment from Xiaofei
"I noticed that ******* quotes locked up shortly after the interest rate announcement yesterday while yours stayed stable." - Comment from Ron in Utah
"Boy, probably spent a thousand hours trying to get ******* API to work right. And now two hours to have something running with IQFeed. Hmmm, guess I was pretty stupid to fight rather than switch all this time. And have gotten more customer service from you guys already than total from them… in five years." - Comment from Jim
"Version 4.0.0.2 has been working well for me and I appreciate that it is now a much tighter client to work with. I feel I can go to press with my own application and rely on a stable platform" - Comment from David in IA.
"After all the anxiety I had with my previous data provider it is a relief not to have to worry about data speed and integrity." - Comment from Eamonn
"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
"IQFeed version 4 is a real screamer compared to anything else I have seen." - Comment from Tom
"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post
"Everything is working great ! Very impressive client. The news refreshes better and is more pertinent than the ******* feed I paid $ 100/month for. I Also like the charts a lot." - Comment from Leon
"Just a quick one to say I'm very impressed so far :) The documentation for developers is excellent and I've quickly managed to get an app written to do historical downloads. The system is very robust and pretty quick considering the extent of data that's available. The support guys have been very helpful too, in combination with the forums it's been plain sailing so far!" - Comment from Adam
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »IQFeed Developer »IQFeed Developer Support »Questions on upgrading to protocol 6.0
Author Topic: Questions on upgrading to protocol 6.0 (5 messages, Page 1 of 1)

jonnyb
-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 116
Joined: Aug 15, 2012


Posted: Jun 21, 2018 07:28 PM          Msg. 1 of 5
If I update the iqfeed client to 6.0.0.4 and keep all of my existing code running on protocol 5.2 nothing should break, is that correct?

Curious why LabelAtBeginning became the default option for historical interval data? Seems like leaving LabelAtEnd as the default would have been less disruptive and prevented the need for digging through old code to add a field.

Craig
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 258
Joined: Apr 16, 2010


Posted: Jun 22, 2018 04:58 PM          Msg. 2 of 5
I'd like an answer regarding the interval changes as well, why?

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Jun 23, 2018 05:07 PM          Msg. 3 of 5
Hello,

This change was to bring us in line with what it felt like new developers were expecting from us. Many competitors do not provide an option of how to label their intervals and when comparisons were being done, there would invariably be off by one problems. This was to help eliminate that hurdle.

We felt that, since this would not affect any past protocols, that we could add this change without impacting users much. My expectation was that if someone was going to be editing their code anyhow, to update the protocol, then adding the additional parameter to the HIT, HIX, and HID requests would be acceptable.

My apologies if I underestimated that.

Tim

altmany
-Interested User-
Posts: 50
Joined: Jul 30, 2018

IQML - IQFeed-MATLAB connector


Posted: Jul 30, 2018 05:56 AM          Msg. 4 of 5
Perhaps the transition to 6.0 could be made easier if there were a global option that could be set during connection time and would apply a default value to LabelAtBeginning for all subsequent historic data requests (similar to setting the CLIENT NAME). Then users could set that option directly adjacent to the code that sets the protocol, and would not have to worry about modifying any of the data queries elsewhere in their program. Perhaps something such as this:

S,SET OPTION,DefaultLabelAtBeginning,0

Then, if the users use the standard HIX/HID/HIT commands without the extra LabelAtBeginning field (as in legacy 5.0-5.2 code), the new DefaultLabelAtBeginning would apply, and if they do specify the field then it would take precedence.

You can easily extend this mechanism to other options in the future.


- Yair
IQML - IQFeed-Matlab connector
https://undocumentedmatlab.com/IQML

Edited by altmany on Aug 2, 2018 at 04:41 AM

DTN_Tim Walter
-DTN Guru-
Posts: 1238
Joined: Apr 25, 2006


Posted: Jul 30, 2018 12:12 PM          Msg. 5 of 5
That is certainly fair, that would also be useful for setting protocols and more.

We'll discuss it and see if it could be worked in sometime for a future release. Thanks for the idea.

Tim
 

 

Time: Sat August 8, 2020 1:17 PM CFBB v1.2.0 16 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003