lars67
-Interested User-
Posts: 11
Joined: Dec 30, 2005
|
Posted: Jan 9, 2007 09:45 AM
Msg. 1 of 5
In feb 2006 DTNIQ wrote: We have released version 4.1.1.1 of IQFeed which contains a few minor bug fixes as well as initial client support for second resolution when released on our servers.
************** This message of yours is almost 1 year old. It would be nice if your servers soon supported this feature. Have you any time estimates? It is like nothing is happening
Cheers, Lars
|
skunk
-DTN Evangelist-
Posts: 249
Joined: May 7, 2004
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2007 07:47 AM
Msg. 2 of 5
They have been promising that the development is complete just pending final testing for more than 2 years...
|
lars67
-Interested User-
Posts: 11
Joined: Dec 30, 2005
|
Posted: Jan 22, 2007 04:24 AM
Msg. 3 of 5
It would be extremely nice, if the management would pay attention to this issue and give an estimate of this. We as developes need this kind of information, so we can plan future development or start sopiing around for API´s that support second/msec resolution.
IQfeed is a good feed but loyality only goes so far.
|
DTN_Jay_Froscheiser
-VP, Product Operations-
Posts: 1746
Joined: May 3, 2004
DTN IQFeed/DTN.IQ/DTN NxCore
|
Posted: Jan 22, 2007 09:10 AM
Msg. 4 of 5
Lars,
There is a lot of attention being paid to development priorities and the need to get some new features (such as second resolution) out the door. I no longer give estimated release dates because we haven't been good at hitting them. Giving you a date will only set a possible false expectation and lead to dissapointment if we don't hit it. I can assure you that our current top priority in development includes a complete overhaul of our server code. This overhaul includes second resolution as well as pre-post market data in intraday history. Primary development is complete, and we are now running through regression and QA testing on that code.
Jay Froscheiser DTN - Trading Markets
|
lars67
-Interested User-
Posts: 11
Joined: Dec 30, 2005
|
Posted: Jan 22, 2007 11:41 PM
Msg. 5 of 5
Jay Thanks for replying. I just get nervous ticks as time passes by. This reminds me a bit about the company "famatech" http://www.famatech.com/support/forum/read.php?FID=24&TID=11091They too have a "floating" timeframe, now entering its 3:rd year of delays for version 3. I sure hope this will not be the case here. I mean even Microsoft gives out time estimates of future versions. Sometimes they are right on schedule sometimes not ,but at least we are kept into the loop of the development cycle. /Lars
|